The dispute, which has drawn international attention due to the scale of the alleged loss, centers on claims that the woman used strategically placed CCTV cameras inside the couple’s home to capture sensitive information, including the recovery phrase required to access the man’s cryptocurrency holdings.

A man has accused his wife of orchestrating the theft of approximately $172 million worth of bitcoin by allegedly exploiting home surveillance cameras to gain access to his hardware wallet, according to court filings and local media reports.

The dispute, which has drawn international attention due to the scale of the alleged loss, centers on claims that the woman used strategically placed CCTV cameras inside the couple’s home to capture sensitive information, including the recovery phrase required to access the man’s cryptocurrency holdings.

The husband alleges that the breach occurred over several months, during which the wife reportedly monitored his actions as he accessed his hardware wallet—a physical device used to store cryptocurrency keys offline for enhanced security. According to the complaint, the stolen funds were subsequently transferred out of the wallet in multiple transactions designed to avoid detection.

Legal representatives for the husband argue that the case highlights a growing vulnerability in personal crypto security, where physical surveillance can undermine even the most secure digital storage methods. “This was not a hack in the traditional sense,” the filing states. “It was a calculated exploitation of human behavior and environmental access.”

The wife has denied the allegations, with her legal team describing the claims as “unsubstantiated and speculative.” They argue that there is insufficient evidence directly linking her to the missing funds and have called for a full forensic review of the transactions.

Cybersecurity experts say the case underscores the importance of safeguarding private keys and recovery phrases, which, if exposed, can grant complete control over crypto assets. Unlike traditional banking systems, cryptocurrency transactions are irreversible, making recovery efforts particularly challenging once funds have been moved.

Authorities have not confirmed whether a criminal investigation is underway, but legal analysts suggest the case could set a precedent for how courts handle disputes involving digital assets and alleged domestic breaches of trust.

The incident also raises broader concerns about the intersection of surveillance technology and financial privacy. While CCTV systems are commonly used for home security, experts warn that improper placement or misuse could inadvertently expose sensitive personal information.

As the case proceeds, it is expected to test both legal frameworks and cybersecurity practices in an era where digital wealth increasingly intersects with everyday domestic life.

No court date has been publicly announced.